1 2025:CGHC:5110-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 369 of 2025 1 - Smt. Jyoti Sahu W/o Rishkripa Sahu Aged About 36 Years R/o Vil- lage Khamhariya, P.S. Seepat, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Vandna Sahu @ Soniya W/o Rohit Kumar Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Amali, Police Station Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. Present Address Rajgamar, Korba, Chowki, Rajgamar, District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Police of Police Station Pam- garh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 2 - Meena Sahu W/o Bharat Poshan Sahu Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Darri, Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Achyut Tiwrai, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 29.01.2025 1 Heard Mr. Achyut Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent No.1. ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.01.29 17:36:21 +0530 2 2 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and kindly set aside / quash the F.I.R./crime no.432/2024 registered at police station Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), the charge sheet filed against the petitioners under section 498-A, 34 of I.P.C. and the proceedings of criminal case no.1312/2024 pending before JMFC Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa against the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3 On perusal of the prayer in the present petition, it transpires that the present petition is drafted with the prayer which is defective one, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer as there is no mention of the date of registration of the FIR, to which learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file afresh petition with proper prayer. 4 Learned State counsel has no objection. 4 Learned State counsel has no objection. 5 In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the 3 petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Special School for Visual & Hearing Impaired, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 6 Certified copy of the impugned FIR and other documents may be returned back to the petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu