- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3363 WP No. 104377 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.104377 OF 2024 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SRI MALLANAGOUDA M. GOUDAR S/O. MUKANAGOUDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER CUM CONDUCTOR, NWKRTC, BAGALKOT DEPOT, BAGALKOT DIVISION DIST: BAGALKOT – 587 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAVI HEGDE AND SRI VINAYKUMAR BHAT, ADVOCATES) AND: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER DISCIPLINARY AUTHROITY, NWKRTC, BAGALKOT DIVISION, DIST: BAGALKOT – 587 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRASHANT S. HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 08/07/2024 IN NO. VA. KA. RA. SA/ BHAVI/SHISTU/876/2024/2329/2024, VIDE ANNEXURE-B, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT, AND. CONSEQUENT UPON QUASHING THE AFORESAID ORDER AS SEQUEL DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PUT BACK THE PETITIONER IN THE SAME POST AND SAME EARLIER TO IMPUGNED ORDER AND ETC., Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3363 WP No. 104377 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEAIRNG B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The petitioner in the subject petition seeks an identical relief of quashment of the order of suspension and put the petitioner back to the same post. 2. It transpires that this Court in terms of its order dated 26.07.2024, had stayed the order of suspension. During the subsistence of the petition, the respondent- Corporation has revoked the order of suspension on 20.09.2024 and directed the petitioner to report to duties. The petitioner has not joined in the light of the interim order subsisting. 3. It is made clear in the order, the order of suspension was stayed, which is no longer in existence, as the Corporation has revoked the order of suspension. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to abide by the revocation - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3363 WP No. 104377 of 2024 of order of suspension and the place of posting. Petition, in the light of the revocation of suspension, is rendered infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NAA/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0