Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6375 (UTT)

DINESH BHARTI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1079/2020 · 2025-06-19

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5169 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1079 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for petitioners. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 and 2. 3. Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, learned counsel for respondent No.3. 4. Learned State Counsel passed on to this Court instruction dated 18.06.2025, which is taken on record. On the basis of said instruction, he submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioners except petitioner No.3 on 17.09.2022 (petitioner No.3-Rishit Bharti has been exonerated from the charges. 5. The said fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. 7. Interim order dated 22.07.2020 stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 19.06.2025 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f9f0276c16 432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A83D84BDB0 F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.06.20 10:25:38 +05'30'