Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63739 (ALL)

SATYENDRA v. STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

WRIC/17712/2025 · 2025-05-27

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:91187 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17712 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satyendra Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Lakshmi Kant Pandey,Sandeep Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State- respondents. 2. The petitioners have preferred the present petition inter alia with the following prayers:- "I. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the application dated 13.02.2025 of the petitioner for permission should be granted to keep the license number 7252/Police Station Suriyawan revolver/pistol whose UIN number is 336331004620572024 with oneself while traveling throughout the State or outside States, for the security of the property and life of the petitioner, within a specified period with to be fixed by this Hon'ble court." 3. It is argued that representation made by the petitioner before Respondent no. 2 but till date no decision has been taken in the matter. 4. On the other hand, it is argued by learned Standing Counsel that in case, the petitioner will submit a representation before the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, District Bhadohi, he will pass appropriate orders in the matter expeditiously. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file a representation ventilating all his grievances before respondent No.2/respondent No.2/District Magistrate, District Bhadohi along with all relevant documents and papers on which the petitioner are making reliance and a certified copy of this order within a period of three weeks from today. In case, the representation is filed within the stipulated period, the respondent No.2 will pass appropriate orders most expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of submission of representation. Order Date :- 28.5.2025 Arti Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad