Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6373 (HP)

SANTOSH KUMARI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/2514/2024 · 2025-09-01

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.2514 of 2024 Decided on: 01.09.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Santosh Kumari ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors . …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge This writ petition has been filed for grant of following substantive reliefs:- “(i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner w.e.f. 17-6- 2006, and grant her all consequential benefits like pay, increments, seniority, fixation of pay, arrear, promotion and pension etc. (ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to release the arrears of salary etc to the petitioner along with 9% interest, in stipulated period. (iii) That the record of the case may kindly be called for and after perusing the same the respondents may kindly 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - be directed to consider the case of petitioner in view of judgment in Jaisi Ram case i.e. OA 5379/2018, and decision taken by Government in his case and grant all consequential benefits to the petitioner.” 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that appropriate reliefs regarding conferment of work charge status upon the petitioner have not been prayed for in the petition. Pleadings in support of conferment of work charge status have also not been raised in the writ petition, hence, the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition after incorporating proper pleadings and reliefs. Prayer is not objected to. Granting such permission, this wit petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge September 1, 2025 R.Atal