Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010014492025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/66/2025 SANEKA PARVIN W/O HAF H. RAHMAN 952TPT COY ASE, C/O 99 APO, PIN - 905952, VILL - SURUN, P.O. - PARAHARIPUR, P.S. - ITAHAR, DIST - UTTAR DINAJPUR, WEST BENGAL, PIN - 733143 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REP BY THE PP ASSAM 2:MUNENDRA KUMAR S/O PRITAM SINGH P/R/A UNIT 822 (FD WKSP COY EME) JAMMU AND KASHMIR (PATTAN) PIN-906822. PERMANENT ADD- VILL- SALEMPUR P.O.-SALEMPUR DIST- BULAND SAHAR STATE- UTTAR PRADESH PIN-203001 3:CHAUDHARI RAMESH KUMAR VELA BHAI S/O CHAUDHARI VELA BHAI P/R/A 526 ASC BN A-COMPANY I - PALATOON C/O 56 APO PIN-905526 CITY - JAMMU STATE - JAMMU AND KASHMIR PERMANENT ADD - VILL- SALIMGADH TEHSIL - KANKREJ DIST - BANASKANTHA P.O. - TERVADA P.S. - TERVADA PIN - 385320 Page No.# 2/4 STATE - GUJRA Advocate for the Petitioner : NEKIBUR ZAMAN CHOUDHURY, MR. A R BHUYAN,, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Crl.Pet./816/2024 MUNENDRA KUMAR AND ANR S/O PRITAM SINGH P/R/A UNIT 822 (FD WKSP COY EME) JAMMU AND KASHMIR (PATTAN) PIN-906822. PERMANENT ADD- VILL- SALEMPUR P.O.-SALEMPUR DIST- BULAND SAHAR STATE- UTTAR PRADESH PIN-203001 2: CHAUDHARI RAMESH KUMAR VELA BHAI S/O CHAUDHARI VELA BHAI P/R/A 526 ASC BN A-COMPANY I - PALATOON C/O 56 APO PIN-905526 CITY - JAMMU STATE - JAMMU AND KASHMIR PERMANENT ADD - VILL- SALIMGADH TEHSIL - KANKREJ DIST - BANASKANTHA P.O. - TERVADA P.S. - TERVADA PIN - 385320 STATE - GUJRAT VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM 2:SANEKA PARVIN W/O HAF H. RAHMAN 952TPT COY ASE C/O 99 APO PIN - 905952 VILL - SURUN P.O. - PARAHARIPUR Page No.# 3/4 P.S. - ITAHAR DIST - UTTAR DINAJPUR WEST BENGAL PIN - 733143 ------------ Advocate for : MR. ANANTA RAM MEDHI Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA 04/02/2025 Heard Mr. A R Bhuyan, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. D. P. Goswami, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. 2. This application has been filed praying for modification/rectification of the order dated 17.12.2024 passed by this Court in Crl. Pet. No. 816/2024. 3. In para-5 of the said order, it is mentioned that Mr. Borah, appearing for the said woman submits that she has no objection if the criminal proceeding against the petitioners is quashed. 4. Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the applicant submits that it was not Mr. Bora, rather it was Ms. Bora. 5. Mr. Bhuyan, further submits that Ms. Bora is his colleague and she did not have sufficient experience in legal practice. Therefore, she might have made the mistake by stating the said thing before this Court. 6. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides. 7. The statement of Ms. Bora was recorded by this Court as it was. Therefore, there is no error to be corrected. Page No.# 4/4 8. This Court is of the opinion that the present I.A. does not have any merit and stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant