Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63723 (ALL)

VRIJ MINOR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

WRIC/16638/2024 · 2025-03-17

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:38654 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16638 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vrij Minor Respondent :- Union Of India And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Hira Lal Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Bharat Pratap Singh,Rajesh Tripathi Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. List has been revised. Learned counsel for the respondents is not present. However, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to take the admission of the petitioner in Class-I. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authority to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 09.05.2024 within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court. (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the present case. (iv) Award cost o the petition to the petitioners." 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner applied online form of Class-I for admission in the school of respondent no.2 and got selected for admission as per lottery system.Thereafter, petitioner went to the office of respondent no.2 to take admission, but the school management refused to admit the petitioner on the ground that the address mentioned in the application form is beyond 12 kms. away from the school. In this respect, petitioner submitted application/representation dated 09.05.2024 to the respondent no.2 through registered post, but no heed has been paid on the same. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner can very well be considered by the respondent no.2. 6. In such view of the fact, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.2-Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya, 39 GTC, Varanasi Cantt., Varanasi along with a certified copy of this order, raising all his grievances within a period of two weeks from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a period of two weeks thereafter. 7. The writ petition is disposed of subject to the observations made above. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 NS Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad