MITHILESH YADAV @ MITHILESH KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/10831/2025 · 2025-10-09
Lakshmi Kant Shukla, Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63697 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63697 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10831 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the First Information Report dated 09.09.2025, giving rise to Case Crime No. 532 of 2015, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Cantt., District Varanasi.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record.
3. After some length of arguments, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State informs the Court that the investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has also been filed against the accused persons including the petitioner on 14.06.2025. In support of his contention, he has drawn the attention of the Court to the averments made in paragraph no. 3 of the short counter affidavit, filed on behalf of the State.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy available to him under the law.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that investigation has already been completed and a charge-sheet has also been filed, we do not find any good reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raees Ahamad, Rehan Ahamad, Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithilesh Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Accordingly, in view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy available to him under the law, as advised. October 10, 2025 Brijesh Maurya CRLP No. 10831 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad