GHASI RAM SON OF SHRI SEDU RAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/536/2025 · 2025-08-26
Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6367 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6367 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:33862-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc.3rd Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 536/2025 In D.B.Criminal Appeal No.745/2015 Ghasi Ram Son Of Shri Sedu Ram Meena, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Nayabas, Toda Jaysinghpura Police Station Tahala, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Alwar) ----Accused Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Rahul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 26/08/2025
1. Heard on third suspension of sentence application.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the accused applicant has served the sentence of more than 11 years and nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused applicant. Counsel further submits that dead body of the deceased has been recovered at the instance of the co-accused-Chottelal and the accused is 72 years old person and he is serving the sentence at open air camp.
[2025:RJ-JP:33862-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-536/2025]
4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate has opposed the third suspension of sentence application.
5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that the accused is 72 years old and he has served the sentence more than 11 years and nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused applicant and also considering the fact that hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time, we deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence of the present accused-applicant during the pendency of the appeal.
7. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous third suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that the accused-applicant shall appear before this Court on 07.10.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Anu /20