113 JASBIR SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. that he should be considered under the Old Pension Scheme, which applicable prior which is cau 2. has already raised the said grievance in the legal noti IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI CWP-15380 Date of Decision : 27 JASBIR SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI None for the petitioner. Mr. T.P.S Chawla, Sr. DAG *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) None for the petitioners. Mr. T.P.S Chawla, Sr. DAG Punjab. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the petitioner is only that he should be considered under the Old Pension Scheme, which cable prior to 01.01.2004 but the benefit of the same is not being give which is causing prejudice to him. A bare perusal of the pleadings would show already raised the said grievance in the legal noti IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15380-2025 Date of Decision : 27-05-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS ........Respondent(s) HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI T.P.S Chawla, Sr. DAG Punjab. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) DAG Punjab. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) petitioner is only claiming direction that he should be considered under the Old Pension Scheme, which e benefit of the same is not being give A bare perusal of the pleadings would show that the petitioner already raised the said grievance in the legal notice dated 20.02.2025 ........Respondent(s) HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI rection that he should be considered under the Old Pension Scheme, which is e benefit of the same is not being given, the petitioner 20.02.2025 SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.27 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-15380-2025 -2- (Annexure P-6) but the same is still pending consideration with the respondents. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. T.P.S Chawla, Sr.DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent- State and submits that in case, the legal notice dated 20.02.2025 (Annexure P-6) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. Learned State counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioner in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the petitioner for his information and necessary action. 5. Keeping in view the statement of learned State counsel, no further order is required to be passed in the present writ petition at this stage and the same is accordingly disposed of. 27-05-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.27 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document