HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16687 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Shri Shad Khan, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Mumtaz Ali, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Shri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings, including proceedings of Criminal Case No.650 of 2019, arising out of Case Crime No.21 of 2017, under Sections 324, 325 IPC, P.S. Aurangabad, District Bulandshahr, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Bulandshahr, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 5. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mumtaz Ali Manoj And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned charge-sheets/cognizance- summoning order and entire proceedings of Case Crime No.21 of 2017, under Sections 324, 325 IPC, P.S. Aurangabad, District Bulandshahr, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Bulandshahr, against the applicants, are hereby quashed. 7. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. September 22, 2025 RKM A482 No. 16687 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad