Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR-3215-2022 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (262) CR-3215-2022 Date of decision: - 12.08.2025 Gurdev Singh ....Petitioner Versus Madhu Bala and others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. On 22.10.2024, this Court was pleased to pass the following
order: -
“Present:- Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. *** As per report of the Registry, respondent No.1 has died, whereas, notices issued to respondents No.2 and 3 have been received back unserved as they are residing in foreign country. Respondent No.4 has refused to accept notice and affixation has been done and accordingly, respondent No.4 is proceeded against ex-parte.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for an adjournment to take the necessary steps in order to meet the objections of the Registry. Adjourned 28.01.2025.
October 22, 2024”
2. As per report of the Registry, the said order has not been complied with.
NARESH KUMAR 2025.08.13 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement
CR-3215-2022 -2-
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present revision petition be disposed of, at this stage, but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after complying with the above-said order.
4. In view of the above, the present revision petition is disposed of, at this stage, with the aforesaid liberty.
( VIKAS BAHL ) August 12, 2025
JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.08.13 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement