Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010014472021 2025:GAU-AS:3130 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/502/2021 AJIT RANJAN ACHARJEE S/O. LT. SITANGSHU RANJAN ACHARJEE, R/O. RAILWAY COLONY, WARD NO.4, HOJAI TOWN, P.O. AND P.S. HOJAI, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 11 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-07. 3:DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (MPC) ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-07. 4:SUPDT. OF RAILWAY POLICE ASSAM PANDU GUWAHATI-12. 5:THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE (SLC) HEADED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM CHIEF SECRETARY ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. Page No.# 2/4 6:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC) HEADED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM DY. COMMISSIONER DIST. KAMRUP (M) PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01. 7:KAUSHIK DEB S/O. LT. KHAMENDU DEB WORKING UNDER RESPONDENT NO.-4 THE SUPDT. OF RAILWAY POLICE ASSAM PANDU GUWAHATI-12. 8:SRI PALLAB KUMAR BARUAH S/O. LT. DEBA KUMAR BARUAH WORKING UNDER RESPONDENT NO.-4 THE SUPDT. OF RAILWAY POLICE ASSAM PANDU GUWAHATI-12. 9:SMT. KANAKLATA KALITA W/O. LT. KANDARPA KALITA WORKING UNDER RESPONDENT NO.-4 THE SUPDT. OF RAILWAY POLICE ASSAM PANDU GUWAHATI-12. 10:SMT. SOROJ DEVI W/O. LT. RABINDRA DAS WORKING UNDER RESPONDENT NO.-4 THE SUPDT. OF RAILWAY POLICE ASSAM PANDU GUWAHATI-12. 11:SMT. PURNIMA DAS S/O. LT. RABINDRA DAS WORKING UNDER RESPONDENT NO.-4 THE SUPDT. OF RAILWAY POLICE ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 PANDU GUWAHATI-12. 12:KAMARUN NESSA W/O. LT. NOOR ISLAM ALI WORKING UNDER RESPONDENT NO.-4 THE SUPDT. OF RAILWAY POLICE ASSAM PANDU GUWAHATI-12 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S N ADHYAPAK, MR N ISLAM,MR K BHUYAN,R K TALUKDAR,MS B DAS Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MS R DAS (R-11),MR M GARODIA (R-11),MR. P J SAIKIA (r-8),MR H BEZBARUA (R-9),MS. P K DEVI (R-9),MR. S BISWAS,MR C GOGOI,MS D DEVI,MS. A B KAYASTHA (R-12),MR. R DUBEY (R-12),MR. A N I HUSSAIN (R-12) BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE O R D E R 21.03.2025 Mr. K. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has an instruction to withdraw this writ petition. Although, the claim of the petitioner to the post of Grade-III, in terms of the recommendation of the District Level Committee and accordingly, on compassionate ground has been negated, however, the State Level Committee has recommended for Grade-IV post, on which the petitioner has been appointed and joined. Mr. J.K. Goswami, learned Government Advocate, Mr. C. Gogoi, learned counsel for the respondent no.7 and Mr. R. Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent no.12 are present. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner Page No.# 4/4 and also considered that the petitioner has been appointed in the Grade-IV post on compassionate appointment and has already joined in the said post, the prayer for withdrawal of this writ petition is accepted. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant