Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63607 (BOM)

RAVINDRA S/O BAPURAO NIKULE v. KAMALCHAND S/O FAKIRCHAND BATHAV

APEAL/146/2013 · 2025-12-05

Shri M M Nerlikar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 62 apeal 146.13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 146/2013 (Ravindra S/o Bapurao Nikule Vs. Kamalchand S/o Fakirchand Bathav) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A. K. Waghmare, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Anup Dangore, Advocate for respondent. CORAM: M. M. NERLIKAR, J . DATED : 05/12/2025. Heard. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent makes a statement that respondent -Kamalchand s/o Fakirchand Bathav is no more. Statement is accepted. 3. In view of above, the appeal is abated against the respondent, hence appeal stands disposed of as abated against the respondent. ( M. M. NERLIKAR , J.) Gohane