MAHENDRA KUMAR CHOUDHARY SON OF SHRI RAMCHANDRA CHOUDHARY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2308/2025 · 2025-02-18
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6360 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6360 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2308/2025
1. Mahendra Kumar Choudhary Son Of Shri Ramchandra Choudhary, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Village Baghera, Tehsil Kekri, District Ajmer, At Present Posted At Government Senior Secondary School Bhanvta, Block Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Raj).
2. Rameshwar Prasad Choudhary Son Of Shri Banna Lal, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Village Baghera, Tehsil Kekri, District Ajmer, At Present Posted At Government Senior Secondary School Kanoj, Block Kekri, District Ajmer (Raj).
3. Bhanwar Lal Jat Son Of Shri Banna Lal Jat, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 11, Bhagyoday Nagar, Ward No. 12, Ajmer Road, Kekri, District Ajmer, At Present Posted At Government Senior Secondary School Mankhand, Block Kekri, District Ajmer (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj).
2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner (Raj).
3. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, District Ajmer (Raj).
4. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, District Tonk (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swaraj Panwar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 18/02/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a
(2 of 2) [CW-2308/2025] representation in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012).
2. Heard.
3. This Court directs Respondent No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioners, if filed, and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular dated
19.02.2024.
4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /215