APHC010058882020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3511/2020 Between: 1. SHARAVA ESWARAIAH, , SON OF YELLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.1- 151, VINAYAKA NAGAR KALIKIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. POTHUNAYUNI BHASKARIAH, , SON OF VENKATADRI, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT INDIRAMMA COLONY, KALIKIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, AP. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, AP. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, AP. 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, MADANAPALLE DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, AP. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, KALIKIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. Page 2 of 5 6. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALIKIRI POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, AP. 7. VEERAMREDDIGARI MAL REDDY, SON OF MAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDING AT CROSS ROAD, KALIKIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, AP. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V SURENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3511 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the the respondents 1 to 6 herein to provide police assistance in implementing the Injunction order as granted in I.A.No.495 of 2019 in OS.No.181 of 2019 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Vaialapad dt. 04.07.2019 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and also contrary to the law declared by this Hon'ble Court in a reported judgment 2014 (2) ALD 281 and also WP.No.28765 of 2016 dated 20.07.2017 by depriving the rights of the petitioners as contemplated under Articles 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent herein to take appropriate action against the 6th respondent for not taking steps to complete the investigation in Cr.No.il of 2020 of Kalikiri Police Station.…” 2. None represented for the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. However, the petitioners are at liberty to workout their remedy before the competent Civil Court, where a civil suit is pending. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.09.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.3511 of 2020 Dated.08.09.2025 TVN 182