Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6358 (GAU)

WAJID HUSSAIN ALIAS MUNNA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/59/2025 · 2025-01-23

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010014402025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/59/2025 WAJID HUSSAIN ALIAS MUNNA S/O- LATE HYDER HUSSAIN, R/O- BORGURI, ANIRUDDHA DEV NAGAR, P.O,P.S AND DIST-TINSUKIA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP ASSAM 2:MISS AMINA KUMAR ALIAS SUKH W/O- MOHAN TANTI R/O- NAKHRAI TEA ESTATE P.S AND DIST-TINSUKIA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : RAVI SHANKAR MISHRA, MR. A K GUPTA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Bail Appln./3770/2024 WAJID HUSSAIN @ MUNNA S/O LATE HYDER HUSSAIN R/O BORGURI ANIRUDDHA DEV NAGAR P.O. Page No.# 2/3 P.S. AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY THE PP ASSAM 2:MISS. RAIMA CHAKRABORTY C/O SUPRATIM CHAKRABORTY URBAN DHABA OPPOSITE DURGA MANDIR SUBOCHARINI ROAD P.O. P.S. AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786125 ------------ Advocate for : MR. A K GUPTA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 24.01.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. A. K. Gupta is present on behalf of the applicant/petitioner Wajid Hussain @Munna. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. K. Baishya is present on behalf of the respondent State. Through this I.A. No. 59/2025, the applicant/accused has submitted that the informant was impleaded as opposite party/respondent No. 2 in B.A. No. 3770/2024, but in the meanwhile, opposite party/respondent No. 2 has passed Page No.# 3/3 away and this application has been filed for impleading the victim as a respondent in B.A. No. 3770/2024. The order dated 08.01.2025 in B.A. No. 3770/2024, clearly reflects that the informant has passed away as is evident from the Trial Court Records. After considering the submissions of both the sides, application for impleading the victim as respondent No. 2 is allowed. However, the name of the victim should be redacted or masked in the amended cause-title. The name of the informant as respondent No. 2 is hereby deleted. In terms of the above observation, I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant