Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63579 (ALL)

JAYA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/7626/2025 · 2025-07-06

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:105873 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7626 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jaya Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subhanshu,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:- "a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for calling the record and quashing the appointment of respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5 in respective institution as per result/select list as declared by the Director of Higher Education on 21.04.2022, since they are junior to petitioner. b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to decide the issue of placement/appointment of petitioner, being senior in merit to respondent nos. 3, 4 and 5 already given appointment, as represented before the authorities which is pending in the representation 10.05.2025 the issue be decided within the period stipulated fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that his representation dated 10.05.2025 pending before respondent no. 2 may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard Shri Shailendra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Shubhanshu, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is provided to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no. 2 within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no. 2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 SY (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad