Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6357 (PNJ)

KARANVIR SHARMA v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER

CRM-M/73122/2025 · 2026-01-21

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- CRM-M-73122-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (206) CRM-M-73122-2025 Date of Decision:-21.01.2026 Karanvir Sharma ……Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Kartik Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 554 dated 20.11.2025 under Section 64 of BNS Act, 2023 registered at Police Station Zirakpur, District SAS Nagar, Punjab. 2. Vide order dated 23.12.2025, this Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join investigation. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no longer required. PARUL 2026.01.27 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document -2- CRM-M-73122-2025 4. It’s a strange case where the complainant is two years elder to the petitioner with whom she was in a consensual relationship, which turned sour and therefore, she has lodged the present FIR. However, in a very short span of less than two months, she has entered into a compromise for which the CRM-M-1701-2026 has been filed to quash the present FIR on the basis of compromise. 5. In light of the above, the present petition is allowed. The order dated 23.12.2025 granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the conditions of Section 482 of BNSS, 2023. 6. However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 7. It is made clear that, in case, the petitioner is found involved in any such activity once again, the present concession granted shall automatically stand vacated. 8. It is further made clear that this order shall not be construed as parity qua any other co-accused. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 21.01.2026 Parul Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No PARUL 2026.01.27 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document