IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58745 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-629 Year-2021 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Shambhu Sharan Rai @ Laltun Rai son of Ramashray Ray Ward no 11 Madhepur Ps-Hasanpur Dist- Samastipur 2. Sandeep Ranjan @ Shivam Kumar son of Shambhu Sharan Rai @ Laltun Rai @ Shambhu Sharan Ray Ward no 11 Madhepur Ps-Hasanpur Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sanjeev Kumar Singh son of Late Ramesh Singh Village- Madhepur Ps- Hasanpur Dist- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 4 30-01-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 384, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are agnates of the complainant of the case i.e. O.P. No.2. It is next submitted that there is land dispute in between the parties. It is further submitted that earlier also a complaint case was filed by the O.P. No.2 against the petitioners, which came to be dismissed. It is next submitted that the complainant in the instant complaint case alleges that on 16.12.2021 at about 10.00 A.M. in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58745 of 2024(4) dt.30-01-2025 2/2 morning, when he was on the road, when Shambhu and Shivam armed with iron rod, Garasha, khanti came and demanded extortion and on refusal to pay, they assaulted him and even snatched Rs.25,000/-. The learned counsel next submits that it absolutely does not stand to reason that why the petitioners being relatives of the O.P. No.2 would have demanded extortion. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with C.R. Case No.629/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T