Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1939-2023 (O&M) Decided on:-02.04.2025 Meenakshi Gupta ....Petitioner.. vs. Amrit Lal Gupta
....Respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Vinod Pundir, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ravinder Rana, Advocate, for the respondent. *** HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that a settlement has been arrived at between the parties.
2. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition, as such, the same is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. 2.1 However, it is made clear that the parties shall remain bound by the settlement, as per which, the respondent has undertaken to pay a sum of Rs.6000/- per month as maintenance to the petitioner-wife.
3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand
disposed of. 02.04.2025
(HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/ No SONIKA 2025.04.03 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document