COCP-1947 123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Tek Singh Shri Nilkanth S Avhad and ors CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : HARKESH MANUJA, the interest has not been paid in terms of the Writ Court order. 2. interest on the delayed payment of pensionary benefits which were withheld due to pendency of Vigilance 3. cause is made out under contempt jurisdiction, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail alternative remedy as per law including filing of execution applicati 4. 5. 6. stand disposed of 30.07.2025 sanjay 1947-2023 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. Date of Decision: Tek Singh VERSUS Shri Nilkanth S Avhad and ors CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Mr.Sandeep Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl.A.G., Mr. H.S. Jugait, Advocate for respondent No.3 **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel representing the interest has not been paid in terms of the Writ Court order. On the contrary, learned State counsel informs that the on the delayed payment of pensionary benefits which were withheld due to pendency of Vigilance In view of the aforesaid disputed question of law, no cause is made out under contempt jurisdiction, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail alternative remedy as per law including filing of execution application. Disposed of with liberty aforesaid. Rule discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if an stand disposed of. .2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1947-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.07.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Gunjan Mehta, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Mr. H.S. Jugait, Advocate for respondent No.3. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the interest has not been paid in terms of the Writ Court order. On the contrary, learned State counsel informs that the on the delayed payment of pensionary benefits which were withheld due to pendency of Vigilance inquiry, could not be paid. In view of the aforesaid disputed question of law, no cause is made out under contempt jurisdiction, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail alternative remedy as per law on. Disposed of with liberty aforesaid. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No ...Respondents the petitioner submits that On the contrary, learned State counsel informs that the on the delayed payment of pensionary benefits which were In view of the aforesaid disputed question of law, no cause is made out under contempt jurisdiction, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail alternative remedy as per law y, shall also SANJAY GUPTA 2025.07.30 18:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document