Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11337 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"set aside the impugned order dated 06.02.2025 (Annexure No. 4 to the petition) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No.-1, Meerut in Misc. Case No. 48 of 2022 (Manoj Chaudhary Versus Harsh Tomar and others)."
3. Shri Rahul Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing appeal under Order 41 Rule 1(c) C.PC. against the order impugned.
4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law.
6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same. September 19, 2025 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Shekhar Pal, Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Mishra, Rahul Mishra (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Manoj Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) Harsh Tomar And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad