Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6350 (GAU)

M/S ECI ENGINEERING and CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA and 4 ORS,

Arb.A./15/2014 · 2025-06-04

Budi Habung

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010014672014 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Arb.A./15/2014 M/S ECI ENGINEERING and CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI K. VENKATA RAO, PLOT NO. A-12-13, PANCHAVATI TOWNSHIP, MANIKONDA, RAJENDRA NAGAR MANDAL, RR DIST., HYDERABAD 500089 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA and 4 ORS, REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER/CON LAW, N.F. RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI 781011 2:THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. N.F. RAILWAY AGARTALA FOR GENERAL MANAGER/CON. N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI -781011 3:S.C. RAJAK PRESIDING ARBITRATOR CE/CON-III N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI 781011 4:A.S. HOPINGSON ARBITRATOR and FA and CAO/WST N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI 781011 Page No.# 2/3 5:R. RAJAMANI ARBITRATOR and RETD. CCRS FLAT NO. 3 'RAM PRIYA' AE-172 11TH MAIN ROAD ANNA NAGAR CHENNAI 4 Advocate for the Petitioner : 0, MS.A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : MS.N R RABHA, DR. B N GOGOI,MS.M ACHARYYA,MS.S BHARALI,MRS.U CHAKRABORTY,MS.M CHATTERJEE,MR B N GOGOI,MR.A K SARKAR,SC, NF RLY BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 05.06.2025 None appears on behalf of the appellant. Mrs. U. Chakraborty, learned Standing counsel, NF, Rly. assisted by Ms. M. Chatterjee, learned counsel for the respondent is present. The record reveals that earlier, Mr. R. Paul, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant. However, on 08.04.2025, he informed this Court that he has been instructed by the appellant, not to appear in this case. This case is of 2014. Sufficient opportunities have been given to the appellant for appearance, however, the appellant remained unrepresented. On 27.05.2025, the appellant was granted one last chance for appearance, however today also no one represented on behalf of the appellant. Page No.# 3/3 It is evident that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, this arbitration appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant