Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6350 (CHH)

GAYARAM RATHORE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/804/2022 · 2025-02-18

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:8411 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 804 of 2022 1 - Gayaram Rathore S/o Late Ramlalla Rathore Aged About 73 Years R/o Village Seoni Tahsil Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur. 2 - Collector District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional OfÏcer Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 4 - Nhai Through Project Director Project Implementation Unit Bilaspur Abhilasha Parishar Tifra Bilaspur. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : None for the petitioner For Respondent/State : Shri Satish Gupta, Advocate For Respondent no. 4 : Ms. Aishley Shrivastava, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.02.19 16:19:42 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 18.02.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is praying for following reliefs:- 1.That this Hon’ble Court kindly be pleased to direct the respondents for complying the provision of Section 38 of Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act 2013. 2. Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner. 2. On repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the matter, therefore this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib