IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2614 of 2025 Date of decision: 25.02.2025 Reena. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner has challenged the selection of respondent No.5 as Anganwari Worker in Anganwari Centre Dharampur Sandhu. 2. To a query of the Court, learned counsel for the petitioner admitted that without availing the alternative remedy available for assailing the selection of respondent No.5 as provided in the applicable scheme, the petitioner has straight-away instituted this writ petition. In view of availability of alternative remedy to the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes -2- her grievances in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 25th February, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)