Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63466 (BOM)

JAGDEO S/O TUKARAM INGLE v. WASUDEO ATMARAM CHANDANE AND OTHERS

WP/1759/2019 · 2025-11-03

Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 45.wp1759.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1759 OF 2019 Jagdeo s/o Tukaram Ingle Vs. Wasudeo Atmaram Chandane and Ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. M.V. Amale, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. M.N. Ali, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. A.G. Mate, AGP for respondent Nos.3 to 5/State. CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 03.11.2025 The petitioner challenges the order dated 30.03.2017 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co- operative Society, Amravati Division, Amravati dismissing the appeal No.6/2016 filed under Section 18(4) of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014. 2. Learned AGP for the State points out that the petitioner is having an alternative and efficacious remedy of filing revision before the Registrar General Money Lending, against the said order. 3. In view thereof, the petition is disposed of as not maintainable. The petitioner is at liberty to file revision before the authority within a period of four weeks Prity 2 / 2 45.wp1759.2019 from today. Time spent while prosecuting the writ petition shall be taken into consideration by the authorities while considering the application for condonation of delay. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Prity