Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6346 (JHR)

SHUBHAM KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/1921/2025 · 2025-04-23

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:12336 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S) No. 1921 of 2025 ---- Shubham Kumar, aged about 19 years, Son of Yogendra Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village-Bade, PO.-Maheshtikri, P.S.- Pathargama, Now Basantrai, District-Godda. ........ Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda, P.O. & P.S.-Godda, District- Godda. 3. The District Social welfare officer, Godda, P.O. & P.S.- Godda, District- Godda. 4. The Child Development Project Officer, Pathargama, Now Basantrai, P.O.- Maheshtikri, P.S.- Pathargama, Now Basantrai, District-Godda .....Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner : M/s. Peeyush Krishna Choudhary, Amrit Anunay, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Ankit Kumar, A.C to S.C.-I -- 02/23.04.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities to give appointment to this petitioner on the post of Sevika for Aaganbari Center of village-Bade, Panchayat-Dhapra, P.O.-Maheshtikri, P.S.-Pathargama, District-Godda in view of death of the mother of this petitioner, who died on 15.12.2024 while she was working as Sevika for the aforesaid Centre. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner had filed a representation before the respondent no. 4 but his representation has not been considered till date; as such the respondents may be directed to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed and it is the 2025:JHHC:12336 2 first date of hearing; as such the petitioner may be directed to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 4. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition is hereby disposed of by directing the 4th Respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision with regard to grievance of this petitioner in accordance with law and applicable Rules and Regulations by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 12 weeks and the same shall be communicated to this petitioner. The petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this writ petition along with its order to the 4th Respondent. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) jk