Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63459 (PNJ)

RAM SARUP & ORS v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR

CWP/24531/2013 · 2025-07-10

Aman Chaudhary

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 1473 CWP-24531 Ram Sarup and others vs. State of Punjab and another CWP-20429 Surjit Singh and others vs. CWP-20608 Vakeel Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another CWP-2716- Harbans Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Commission thus, the petitioners regard to the claim as raised in the present petitions, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, counsel has no objection. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 24531-2013 Ram Sarup and others vs. State of Punjab and another 20429-2014 Surjit Singh and others vs. State of Punjab 20608-2014 Vakeel Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another -2014 Harbans Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Sunny Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP-24531 Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP-20429 Ms. Riti Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. S.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP-20608 CWP-2716-2014. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submit that recommendations of the 6 Commission have been implemented, vide notification dated 05.07.2021, the petitioners be granted liberty to submit regard to the claim as raised in the present petitions, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, counsel has no objection. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 10.07.2025 Ram Sarup and others vs. State of Punjab and another f Punjab and Others Vakeel Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another Harbans Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY 24531-2013. Mr. Shivam Kapila, Advocate for 20429-2014. Ms. Riti Aggarwal, Advocate for 20608-2014 and Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel submit that recommendations of the 6th Pay have been implemented, vide notification dated 05.07.2021, submit a representation(s) with regard to the claim as raised in the present petitions, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, to which learned State PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.11 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-24531-2013 and connected cases -2- 2. Disposed of. In case a representation is filed within 4 weeks, the same be decided within a further period of 6 months from its receipt, in accordance with law. 3. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected files. 10.07.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.11 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.