2025:JHHC:29569-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 412 of 2025 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Department of Labour, Employment & Training, having its office at Shram Bhawan, Doranda, P.O. & P.S Doranda, District-Ranchi Jharkhand 2. The Labour Commissioner, Department of Labour, Employment & Training, having its office at Shram Bhawan, Doranda, P.O. & PS- Doranda, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. The Assistant Labour Commissioner-Cum-Cess Assessment Officer (Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996), having its office at Shram Bhawan, Doranda P.O. & PS - Doranda, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand … …. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3/Appellants Versus 1. M/s Anvil Cables Private Limited, a Private Limited Company incorporated and subsisting under the provision of the Companies Act, 2013 having its Registered Office at 102 Krishna, 224, AJC Bose Road, P.O. & P.S. AJC Bose Road, District Kolkata-700017, through its constituted Attorney, Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, aged about 50 years, son of Shri Ravindra Nath Singh, resident of Dewanji Street, Hooghly, P.O. & P.S. Rishra, District Hooghly, Pin Code 711228, West Bengal … …. Writ Petitioner/Respondent 2. Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, through its Managing Director, having its office at Engineering Building, HEC, Dhurwa P.O. and P.S. - Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. General Manager (Project & Financial Management) Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, having its office at Engineering Building. HEC, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand … …. Respondent Nos. 4 & 5/ Proforma Respondents ----- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Appellants : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate General Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. Mr. Ashutosh Anand, A.A.G.-III Mr. Sahbaj Akhtar, A.C. to A.A.G.-III For the Resp. No. 1 : Mr. M.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Salona Mittal, Advocate For the Resp. Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Sr.S.C. (JBVNL) Order No. 05 Dated: 23.09.2025 Today, the present case has been listed under the heading “to be mentioned” as there appears to be typographical 2025:JHHC:29569-DB error in paragraph- 10 of the order dated 18.09.2025 passed in the present appeal, wherein instead of the word “appeal”, the words “writ petition” have wrongly been mentioned. 2. The said error is ordered to be rectified. 3. Accordingly, paragraph-10 of the order dated 18.09.2025 passed in the present appeal is corrected to be read as “With the aforesaid observations and directions, this appeal stands disposed of.” 4. The order dated 18.09.2025 passed in the present appeal is modified to the said extent. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) September 23, 2025 Manish/Ritesh