N. VEERASALINGA PRASAD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/2668/2019 · 2025-06-16
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6345 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6345 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 2668 OF 2019 Between: N. Veerasalinga Prasad, S/o.Subbaiah, Aged 51 years, Occ; Hereditary Archaka of Sri Ganga Paravathavardhini Sametha Sri Ramalingeswara Swamy Temple, Epurupalem, Chirala Mandal, Prakasam District R/o. Epurupalem, Chirala Mandal, Prakasam District. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Velgapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. Rep. By its Principal Secretary
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Guntur, A.P. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly, in the nature of Writ of Mahdamus, Declaring the Notice in Rc.No.A5/ 162/2019 dated 20-02-2019 issued by the 2nd respondent for constitution of may one non-hereditary trust board to Sri Ramalingeswara Swamy temple Epurupalem Village, Chirala Mandal, Prakasam as as bad, illegal, highhanded, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, and articles 14, 21, 25 and 26 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and direct the respondents not to interfere with the affairs of Sri
Ramalingeswara Swamy temple Prakasam District. Epurupalem Village, Chirala Mandal lA NO: 1 OF 7niQ Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Notice in Rc.No.A5/ 162/2019 dated 20-02-2019 issued by the 2nd praying that in the circumstances respondent.
lA NO: 2 OF ?niQ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim
order dated 05.03.2019 WP.No.2668/2018. passed in Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V S K RAMA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: ORDER RAO
APHC010058572019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] I TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 2fifi«/7niQ Between: N. Veerasalinga Prasad ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counselfor the Petitioner:
1.VS KRAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: ==RESPONDENT(S)
ORDER: Sri V.S.K. Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition.
2. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be
order as to costs. no
2 4 As a sequel, ail pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.
Sd/- A. VENU GOPAL RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/ I SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri V S K Rama Rao Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Three CD Copies
2. Pradesh. [OUT]
3. TF
HIGH COURT DATED; 17/06/2025
ORDER WP.No.2668 of 2019 3 1 JUL 2025 o S' DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS