Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63415 (ALL)

RAVINDRA KUMAR @ RAVINDRA VATISH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/18999/2025 · 2025-05-26

Vikram D Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:89748 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 18999 of 2025 Applicant :- Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Vatish And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sachin Sharma,Shivank Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application has been filed by applicants for quashing the impugned cognizance and summoning order dated 10.02.2025 and impugned charge-sheet dated 21.08.2024, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry prohibition Act, 1961 as well as entire proceeding of Case No.1895 of 2025 (State Vs. Ravinder kumar@ Ravinder Vatish) arising out of Case Crime No.70 of 2024, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Ghaziabad pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) FTC-Ist, Ghaziabad. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the applicants states that he may be permitted to withdraw this application filed under Section 528 BNSS with liberty to file bail application before the court below. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 5. Under the circumstances, the present application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicants to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to enable the applicants to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. In case, the bail application is preferred by the applicants before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. While considering the bail application of the applicants, the court below shall keep in mind the principles of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773. 6. The application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction. Order Date :- 27.5.2025 D. Tamang Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad