Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 634 (UTT)

Shalein Chauhan v. State Of Uttarakhand through Chief Secretary

WPSB/61/2016 · 2025-07-02

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPSB No. 61 of 2016 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Rakshit Srivastava, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1. 3. Mr. Krishnakant Joshi, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 4. Mr. Rakshit Srivastava, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner, makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 02.07.2025 Navin