Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63391 (PNJ)

SAHIB SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5507/2025 · 2025-07-17

Manjari Nehru Kaul

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

117. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sahib Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL 1. protect his life and liberty as well as from false implication as he is being unnecessarily harassed by the respondents by visiting his home a messages to come present in the police station. 2. Singh, submits that the petitioner is not required in any criminal case by the police and it is only his brother Act. It has been further s large and it was in that background that the police had raided the house of the petitioner. 3. present petition stands disposed of. July 17, 2025 sanjeev IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sahib Singh Versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. H.S.Deol, Senior DAG, Punjab ------ MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is seeking direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect his life and liberty as well as from false implication as he is being unnecessarily harassed by the respondents by visiting his home a messages to come present in the police station. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Malkiat Singh, submits that the petitioner is not required in any criminal case by the police and it is only his brother, who is booked in a case Act. It has been further submitted that the brother of the petitioner is at large and it was in that background that the police had raided the house of the petitioner. In view of the submissions made by the learned State counsel, t petition stands disposed of. July 17, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5507-2025 Date of decision: 17.07.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondents HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , Advocate, for the petitioner. unjab. Petitioner is seeking direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect his life and liberty as well as from false implication as he is being unnecessarily harassed by the respondents by visiting his home and leaving messages to come present in the police station. State counsel, on instructions from ASI Malkiat Singh, submits that the petitioner is not required in any criminal case by the who is booked in a case under the NDPS ubmitted that the brother of the petitioner is at large and it was in that background that the police had raided the house of In view of the submissions made by the learned State counsel, (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Petitioner is seeking direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect his life and liberty as well as from false implication as he is being nd leaving State counsel, on instructions from ASI Malkiat Singh, submits that the petitioner is not required in any criminal case by the under the NDPS ubmitted that the brother of the petitioner is at large and it was in that background that the police had raided the house of In view of the submissions made by the learned State counsel, SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.07.17 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document