Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63391 (ALL)

PRAVESH KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/25188/2025 · 2025-08-05

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133737 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25188 of 2025 Applicant :- Pravesh Kumari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Singh,Syed Wajid Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Puneet Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused- applicant, Pravesh Kumari, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 48 of 2024, under Sections 306, 506 IPC, Police Station- Bhojipura, District- Bareilly. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent. She has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 10.03.2025. It is submitted that similarly placed co-accused, Chotu has already been enlarged on bail of by the Bench of this Court by order dated 28.07.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 25778 of 2025. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, Chotu, who has already been enlarged on bail, she is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. She has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of her fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. 4. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7. Let the accused-applicant, Pravesh Kumari involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless her personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 8. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel her bail. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 v.k.updh. Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad