122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15523-2025 Date of Decision:28.05.2025 AMISHA GUPTA ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Ankit Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Additional AG, haryana. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for direction to the respondents to allow the petitioner to appear in the 2nd year examination and also allow her to attend the classes for next session. 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further, with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy for refund of the fees which the petitioner deposited as, the petitioner was not allowed to appear in the examination. 3. Learned State counsel submits that in case any such representation is filed, the same will be decided by the competent authority keeping in view the settled principle of law within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. In case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons for not accepting the claim of the petitioner will be mentioned in the speaking order so passed which order will be conveyed to the petitioner for his information and necessary action. 4. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 28.05.2025 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2025.05.29 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh