Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63384 (PNJ)

KRISHAN LAL GUPTA ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA OTHERS

CWP/15463/2025 · 2025-05-28

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-15463-2025 (O&M) 174 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Krishan Lal Gupta and another State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Nishant Maini Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Senior DAG Haryana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate, Ms. Sharvi Dadhwal, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the respondent SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of plot to the petitioner of the same size in the same sector or adjoining sector, as the originally allotted to be duly entitled under the HSVP’s policy dated 06.08.2024 (Annexure P 4). 2. At the outset, l petitioners would be satisfied, in case, 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Krishan Lal Gupta and another versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Senior DAG Haryana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate, Ms. Sharvi Dadhwal, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the respondent ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to plot to the petitioner of the same size in the same sector or adjoining sector, as the originally allotted plot to the petitioner is disputed one to be duly entitled under the HSVP’s policy dated 06.08.2024 (Annexure P At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15463-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: May 28, 2025 ….Petitioners ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana with Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Senior DAG Haryana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG Haryana. Ms. Sharvi Dadhwal, Advocate and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the respondent – HSVP. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondents to allot an alternative plot to the petitioner of the same size in the same sector or adjoining sector, as plot to the petitioner is disputed one, petitioner is stated to be duly entitled under the HSVP’s policy dated 06.08.2024 (Annexure P- earned counsel for the petitioners submits that would be satisfied, in case, pending representation dated 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 s s Writ allot an alternative plot to the petitioner of the same size in the same sector or adjoining sector, as , petitioner is stated - submits that representation dated MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-15463-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 05.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) is considered and decided by respondent No.4, which has not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned counsel for the respondents – State and HSVP appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that grievance of the petitioners will be looked into by respondent No.4 and it shall take decision either way, on the pending representation dated 05.05.2025 (Annexure P-3). 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider the pending representation dated 05.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 10 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 28, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment