Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63350 (PNJ)

SHAM LAL v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

CWP/15434/2025 · 2025-05-27

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15434-2025 Date of Decision:27.05.2025 SHAM LAL ...Petitioner Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Brajesh Kumar Kaundal, Advocate for the petitioner. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) In the present petition, the grievance raised by the petitioner is that vide reply dated 12.03.2025 filed by the Accounts Officer, Pension Revision Cell, his pension has been revised, but, the arrears from the date his revised pension which was to be given has not been given w.e.f. 04.09.2011 till 31.05.2019. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already raised the said grievance in the representation dated 03.03.2025 (Annexure P-9), which is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Mayank Mathur, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.4 and submits that in case, representation dated 03.03.2025 (Annexure P-9) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority keeping in view the KUMUD VERMA 2025.05.29 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. In case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons for not accepting the claim of the petitioner will be mentioned in the speaking order so passed which order will be conveyed to the petitioner for his information and necessary action. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 27.05.2025 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2025.05.29 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh