42 06.11.2025 Ct. No.18 pg. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CPAN 651 of 2024 in WPA 25867 of 2023 Amar Nath Rajoria Vs. Kamalesh Shaw Mr. Debasis Kar Mr. Husen Mustafi Mr. Arka Tilak Bhadra Ms. Suhana Parvin … For the applicant/petitioner Ms. Krishna Yadav … For the alleged contemnor 1. Learned advocate representing the petitioner admits demolition of the unauthorized construction. It has been submitted that though the unauthorized construction has been demolished, but the private respondents are in the process of re-constructing it again. 2. Learned advocate representing the Titagarh Municipality produces photographs in support of the submission that the unauthorized construction has been demolished. 3. The Municipality is directed to ensure that re- construction of the unauthorized construction at the said place does not take place in any manner whatsoever. 2 4. The contempt application stands disposed of. 5. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)