Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6332 (PAT)

Virbahadur Ray v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/6470/2025 · 2026-06-16

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6470 of 2025 ====================================================== Virbahadur Ray Son of Late Sukul Ray alias Sukul Kurmi Resident of Village Katahariya, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- East Champaran at Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Collector West Champaran at Motihari 3. The Superintendent of Police East Champaran at Motihari 4. The Additional Collector East Champaran at Motihari 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer Chakiya, East Champaran at Motihari 6. The Circle Officer Kalyanpur Block, East Champaran at Motihari 7. Parma Rai @ Parmanand Rai Son of Dayali Rai, Resident of Village Katahariya, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate Ms. Rashmi Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (25) For Resp. No. 7 : Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 16-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, by referring to the statutory provisions for filing review application before the Collector, West Champaran at Motihari, proposes to take appropriate remedy for filing review application with all supportive materials / documents within a period of two weeks from today. 3. It is made clear that once such application is filed Patna High Court CWJC No.6470 of 2025(4) dt.16-06-2026 2/2 within a period of two weeks, in such event, status quo shall be maintained till final orders are passed on the proposed review application. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. sharun/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U