Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63317 (ALL)

DHARMENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/8673/2025 · 2025-07-02

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103844 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8673 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner for payment of salary during suspension period as well as promotion of Assistant Clerk to Head Clerk within stipulated period as directed by Hon'ble Court. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to take disciplinary proceeding against Manager, Sri Kachcha Baba Inter College, Jalhoopur, Varanasi as well as D.I.O.S. Varnasi and further taking decision against Management Committee for appointment of authorized controller within stipulated period as directed by Hon'ble court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that his representation dated 15.03.2024, which is pending before respondent no.2, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 10 days from today. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Pratima (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad