Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63284 (PNJ)

RAJDARBAR ICONIC VENTURE PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

CWP/15314/2025 · 2025-08-05

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 126 CWP-15314-2025 (O&M). Date of Decision: 05.08.2025. Rajdarbar Iconic Venture Private Limited ....Petitioner. VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL --- Present: Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhijeet Singh Rawaley, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate and Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate for respondent No.4-HSVP. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to renew the validity of its licence along with various other directions. 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that in the application to Director, Town and Country Planning, the petitioner has objected to hearing of others, who were not necessary parties. He also submits that the petitioner reserves the right to challenge the order passed by the competent authority in the event of the same going against the petitioner. 3. Issue notice to the respondents. JITENDER 2025.08.06 10:30 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC CWP-15314-2025 (O&M) -2- 4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and 5. He upon instructions from Mr. Vikas Yadav, A.T.P. (HQ.) submits that the case of the petitioner along with all other interested parties has been considered by the Department of Town and Country Planning and an order would be passed in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from now. 5. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate and Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.4-HSVP. 6. In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioner appears to have been substantially redressed at this stage. The petition stands disposed of as infructuous at this stage. Needless to observe that it would be open to the petitioner to challenge the order if it goes against it. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE 05.08.2025 jitender Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/ No Whether Reportable : Yes/ No JITENDER 2025.08.06 10:30 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC