AJAY SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/15250/2025 · 2025-05-26
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63276 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63276 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
`
CWP-15250-2025
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 135
CWP-15250-2025 Date of Decision: 26.05.2025 Ajay Singh and others
…Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. S.P. Arora, Advocate for the petitioners
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1.
The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to exclude Secretaries/Assistant Secretaries of Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board from the purview of Model Online Transfer Policy 2025 (Annexure P-3).
2.
The petitioners are holding post of Secretaries/Assistant Secretaries in the office of Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board. In terms of provision of Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (General) Rules, 1962, they are vested with powers and duties of Executive Officers. The respondents circulated Model Online Transfer Policy-2025 and invited objections and suggestions from different Administrative Departments, Head of the Departments and employees of various Departments and/or organizations. The said policy is intended to be introduced with an intent to distribute employees in a fair and transparent manner to achieve maximum MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.26 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgement.
`
CWP-15250-2025
-2- administrative efficiency and optimize job satisfaction amongst the employees.
3.
The petitioners have filed suggestions (Annexure P-4) in response to aforesaid Model Online Transfer Policy. The petitioners are apprehensive that respondent may proceed with implementation of Model Online Transfer Policy without giving due consideration to their suggestions.
4.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who on advance notice is present in Court on behalf of respondent-State, submits that State of Haryana has already notified Model Online Transfer Policy 2025 vide notification dated 23.05.2025, thus, instant petition has rendered infructuous.
5.
Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to assail notification dated 23.05.2023, if so advised.
6.
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 26.05.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.26 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgement.