ANIL KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/17263/2025 · 2025-05-26
Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63273 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63273 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:90013-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17263 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Singh,Nitish Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Anand Prakash Paul,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. The petitioners claim to have purchased Plot No.754 from the transferee of the original allottee. The petitioners have applied for mutation of their name and for sanction of the building plan.
2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for directing the Development Authority to mutate the name of the petitioners in its records and to sanction the building plan.
3. Shri A.P. Paul, learned counsel for the Development Authority very fairly states that the applications filed in this regard would be decided.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.4 to take decision on the mutation application and the application for sanction of building plan within eight weeks from the date of communication of the instant order alongwith photocopy of the mutation application and the application for sanction of building plan. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 27.5.2025 Ankit. Digitally signed by :- ANKIT VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad