Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6327 (KAR)

MR. CHANNAPPAGOUDA PATIL S/O CHABANAGOUDA PATIL v. KITTUR RANI CHANNAMMA URBAN

CRL.RP/100310/2023 · 2025-03-14

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4742 CRL.RP No. 100310 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100310 OF 2023 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MR.CHANNAPPAGOUDA PATIL S/O. CHANBANAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.GURUWAR PETH, A/P.KITTUR, TQ. KITTUR, DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SHARANABASAVARAJ C.S., SRI KUSHAL N. KAMBLE, ADVOCATES) AND: KITTUR RANI CHANNAMMA URBAN SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD., HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT BAILHONGAL, KITTUR BRANCH-591115, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL, SRI. SAGAR DUNDAPPA ULLAGADDI, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, R/O. BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRASHANT MATHAPATI, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 397 R/W. SECTION 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO CALL IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 58/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI AND C.C.NO. 327/2019 ON THE FILE OF J.M.F.C. V, BELAGAVI AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.04.2023 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 58/2022 IN SO FAR AS DISMISSING THE APPEAL OF THE PETITIONER FOR DEFAULT AND ORDER PASSED IN C.C.NO. 327/2019, DATED 24.11.2021 J.M.F.C-V BELAGAVI CONVICTING THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 138 OF NI ACT AND SENTENCING HIM TO PAY A FINE OF RS. 87,000/- AND IN DEFAULT SHALL UNDERGO A SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT FOR A TERM OF 6 MONTHS. V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Date: 2025.03.14 16:02:58 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4742 CRL.RP No. 100310 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. Memo reads as under: “The petitioner seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the above mentioned revision petition. Hence, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above revision petition in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 17