APHC010059172013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 34134/2013 Between: 1. M/S. SRI LAKSHMI SRINIVASA JUTE MILLS LTD., (SKL-106) REGISTERED OFFICE AT BOBBILI ROAD, RAJAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN-CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI K. VENKATA RAO. ...PETITIONER AND 1. A P ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, A.P. SINGARENI BHAVAN, RED HILLS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A P LIMITED, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE, THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 4. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OPERATION CIRCLE, THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 5. GOVERNMENT OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., ENERGY DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the 2 nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring (a) the order dated 12-3-2013 passed by the 1st respondent in O.P. No. 83/2012 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and without jurisdiction and (b) demand and collection of FSA charges relating to 214 quarter of 2012-13 by the 2nd respondent by including FSA charges in the monthly bills of April, May and June, 2013 as highly illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to Clauses 9 and 10 of the Regulation No. 45- B of the A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 1999 and consequently set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 42474 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition by fixing an early date of hearing Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V NAGARJUNA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENERGY 2. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following order: Sri V.Hemanth Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri D.V.Nagaraju, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the same is now rendered infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 07.07.2025 SNI 3 155 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.34134 of 2013 Dated: 07.07.2025 SNI