VIPIN UPADHAYAY AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA529/1832/2025 · 2025-07-06
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63269 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63269 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:105594 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1832 of 2025 Applicant :- Vipin Upadhayay And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhileshwar Pratap Singh,Komal Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. has been filed with a prayer to direct the learned A.M.M.-7th, Budaun to decide the Case No. 4374 of 2014 (State Vs. Vipin Upadhyay and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 43 of 2014, under Section 414 I.P.C., Police Station Civil Lines, District Budaun, expeditiously within a stipulated period.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that it is a very old case of the year 2014. The applicants before this Court are the accused in the said case. All the accused persons had already appeared before the court and charges were framed in the year 2020 and since then the matter is pending but the prosecution has failed to adduce its oral and documentary evidence.
4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer.
5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record.
6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned trial court is directed to make all the endeavours to decide the Case No. 4374 of 2014 (State Vs. Vipin Upadhyay and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 43 of 2014, under Section 414 I.P.C., Police Station Civil Lines, District Budaun expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is also made clear that the Court/Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution
authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case.
8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Rmk. Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad