Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63266 (PNJ)

SOMBIR v. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

CWP/16386/2017 · 2025-08-18

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-16386-2017 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 212 CWP-16386-2017 Date of Decision: 18.08.2025 SOMBIR ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. G.S. Gopera, Advocate for Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the instant proceedings, the petitioner was issued appointment letter and his appointment should be considered from the date of joining of his batchmates. 2. As petitioner was in waiting list and he has already been issued appointment letter, no further order is warranted. 3. Disposed of. 4. Pending application(s), if any stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 18.08.2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.08.18 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document