Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6326 (UTT)

HARIVANSH MAGLURIA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/795/2025 · 2025-07-14

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6076 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 795 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Karan Anand, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Harivansh Magluria’ S/o Manoj Gupta is praying for bail in relation to First Information Report dated 25.03.2025 bearing FIR No. 0058 of 2025 P.S. Premnagar, District Dehradun, wherein, the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3), 324(5) and 352 of BNS, 2023. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and this is a case of no injury and the chargesheet has already been filed and as such there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant. He further submits that the applicant has no previous criminal history and is pursuing B.Com Honours from UPES College, Dehradun. 5. Apart from this, he submits that the other three co-accused persons namely Kartikay Sharma, Ujjawal Sharma and Harsh Tyagi have already been enlarged on bail by this court. 6. On the other side, learned A.G.A. have not disputed this fact that the chargesheet has already been filed and as such there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant and the applicant has no previous criminal history and have also not disputed this fact that the other three co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail. 7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the chargesheet has already been filed and the applicant has no previous criminal history and furthermore the other three 2025:UHC:6076 co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant ‘Harivansh Magluria’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 14.07.2025 PR 2025:UHC:6076