SMT. SAVITRI W/O TUKARAM GEDAM v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, REVENUE AND FOREST, MUMBAI AND ORS.
WP/7379/2025 · 2025-11-27
Shri Anil S Kilor, Shri Rajnish R Vyas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63250 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63250 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
106.wp.7379.25 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.7379 of 2025 Smt. Savitri w/o Tukaram Gedam vs. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. S.S. Taram, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.H. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR & RAJNISH R. VYAS,
JJ .
DATE : 27 th NOVEMBER,
2025.
Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner.
02. According to him, though there is a need for a crematorium and burial ground and the said issue has been raised before the respondent- authorities, the same is not answered.
03. Considering the fact that this issue is not decided by the respondent-authorities, we direct that the present petition be treated as a representation and the same shall be decided within ten weeks from today by the respondent-authorities.
04. The petitioner is directed to furnish the copy of petition along with the order passed by this Court before the authorities within a period of two weeks from today.
05. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (Rajnish R. Vyas, J.)
(Anil S. Kilor, J.) *sandesh 2025:BHC-NAG:13109-DB